Skip to main content

The Manual may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.

Study: Hardware buttons in cars are safer than touchscreens

Enthusiasts are right, touchscreens aren’t nearly as good as traditional physical controls and a new study proves it

If there’s one automotive trend that needs to die off immediately, it’s the move to drop physical controls in favor of complicated touchscreens. Not only does the relatively new trend result in poor interior designs, but an infuriating experience for the driver and passenger. If you’re looking for someone to blame, point your finger toward Tesla. The automaker started the all-digital trend where everything is controlled through the touchscreen in the car. So, thanks, Tesla.

As it turns out, there’s actually some irrefutable data that shows touchscreens are bad for car safety and aren’t as safe as traditional physical controls in a car. Swedish car magazine Vi Bilägare conducted a study where it put 11 modern cars, like the Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Ioniq 5, MG Marvel R, and Subaru Outback, against a 2005 Volvo V70 to see if the older vehicle’s controls were easier and safer to use.

Close up of dashboard, steering wheel, and touchscreen in the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 in a parking lot.
Hyundai

From behind the wheel of the vehicles driving at roughly 68 mph, drivers were asked to complete simple tasks. These included turning on the radio and tuning it to a specific station, turning the temperature up for the climate control system, resetting the trip computer, turning the heated seat on, and other tasks that should be straightforward. Drivers were given time to familiarize themselves with the vehicles before heading off down a closed runway. The outlet measured how long it took the driver to complete the tasks and the distance they traveled while attempting to complete the tasks.

Recommended Videos

The winner, which will come as a surprise to no one, was the 2005 Volvo V70. Despite being the oldest car by a wide margin, Vi Bilägare found it to be the easiest to use by a “large margin.” Drivers could complete the four main tasks with ease within 10 seconds. At the opposite end of the spectrum, the MG Marvel R – a vehicle that’s not sold in the U.S. – took 44.6 seconds for all tasks to be finished.

Vehicles like the BMW iX (30.4 seconds), Hyundai Ioniq 5 (26.7 seconds), Volkswagen ID.3 (25.7 seconds), and Tesla Model 3 (23.5 seconds) all did poorly compared to the V70. The outlet gave vehicles a score from one to five with a higher score correlating to a vehicle that’s easier to use. The V70 earned the highest score of 4.5, while the iX (4.0), Ioniq 5 (3.5), ID.3 (2.25), and Model 3 (3.75) trailed behind. The poor Marvel R had a score of 2.5, yikes.

Close up of central touchscreen in the Volkswagen ID.3 with green grass in the back.
Volkswagen

There’s more bad news as Vi Bilägare found a few areas where automakers are trying to cut costs. Brands like Volkswagen and Seat offer touch-sensitive controls in their vehicles, but some aren’t backlit. This makes them almost impossible to use at night. Instead of offering physical controls, automakers are moving toward having more advanced voice control systems, but they don’t really work that well. The voice recognition systems can get confused by simple requests, fail to understand commands, and don’t work with every function.

Why is this so important? Well, when you’re looking down at an infotainment screen to change some settings, you’re not looking at the road. At a speed of 68 mph, the V70 covered 1,004 feet in 10 seconds. In the MG, the driver traveled 4,501 before completing the four tasks. So, having easy-to-use controls are crucial, because they allow drivers to keep their eyes on the road, making them safer.

It’s not all bad news. Vi Bilägare found that the Dacia Sandero (a car that’s not available in the U.S.), Volvo C40, and Subaru Outback have good infotainment systems that are relatively easy to use. The outlet claims that the Sandero and C40 have infotainment systems that aren’t packed with features, which is what makes them easy to use.

Close up of steering wheel, dashboard, and touchscreen in the Volvo C40 Recharge with a building in the back.
Volvo

Automakers don’t care about these studies or what journalists think — at least, not when it comes to interior controls. As Vi Bilägare points out, automakers want their vehicles to be seen as tech items, like smartphones and tablets. Additionally, large screens make things easier for designers, allowing them to create a “clean” cabin. Then, you have the financial side of things. Screens, somehow, are more affordable than buttons, as automakers can integrate more functions onto a screen and update them whenever they want. So, touchscreens are unsafe and terrible to interact with, but they’re here to stay.

Topics
Joel Patel
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joel Patel is a former contributor for The Manual. His work has also been featured on Autoweek, Digital Trends, Autoblog…
Jerry Seinfeld is selling Steve McQueen’s Hero Car from ‘Le Mans’
Steve McQueen's Hero Porsche 917 is going up for auction
Porsche 917

We've all browsed through used cars in one way or another. If you're above a certain age, you might have flipped through a free magazine outside a grocery or convenience store. Maybe you glanced over at a used car lot you pass on your daily commute or even just scouted out one of the many car apps out there. But when it comes to high-end, previously owned vehicles, they make it to televised auctions for good reason.

There have been plenty of incredible Porsches built over the years, but rarely do we see a true movie star car in excellent condition come up for sale like this stunning Porsche 917. Beyond just being one of the most iconic race vehicles in the history of the autoverse, this particular car had a starring role and was driven by Steve McQueen in the 1971 film Le Mans and can be yours at Mecum's Kissimmee, Florida auction on January 18th, 2025.

Read more
The 2026 Vistiq is Cadillac’s newest EV SUV
Cadillac's Vistiq EV SUV debuts for 2026
Cadillac Vistiq

We really have to hand it to Cadillac. In recent years, GM's luxury line has devoted itself to becoming a true competitor in the high-stakes game of high-end vehicles. Caddy has transformed its previously geriatric-feeling reputation into a lineup of fresh-faced, forward-feeling cars and SUVs that look every bit the part of the lavish lifestyle its German and Japanese competitors have evoked for decades.

Already immersed in the advancement of EV-powered vehicles, Cadillac announced that the Lyriq-V would be the first EV to wear its fabled V-Series high-performance badge just a short while ago. Now, on the heels of that news, Caddy has just debuted its newest EV SUV, the 2026 Vistiq.
The Vistiq will slot between the smaller Lyriq and the massive Escalade IQ

Read more
This is how much the 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 43 will cost
AMG GT 43 gets pricing for 2025
MB AMG GT 43

Some cars are just instant home runs. When Mercedes-AMG debuted the first AMG GT back in 2014, you didn't have to be a car fanatic to appreciate the stunning good looks or throaty exhaust rumble of the newest member of the always fun Grand Touring market. Fast-forward a little more than a decade, and although we first got to lay eyes on the 2025 AMG GT 43 in March of this year, it was not until recently that pricing was made available to the drooling public.
The 2025 AMG GT 43 will start at $105,900

Despite being considered the "entry-level" model of the AMG GT lineup, the GT 43 has a starting price of $105,900, which does not include any destination or delivery fees.

Read more