Skip to main content

Tim Burton lowered the budget on ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ to ensure the film got a theatrical release

The movie has now made an incredible amount at the box office.

Michael Keaton in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.
Warner Bros.

Although most critics agree it doesn’t live up to the original classic, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has been an undeniable box office sensation since it was released in early September. The movie outgrossed the first installment in its opening weekend, and has now made more than $250 million worldwide.

According to reporting in The New York Times, ideas for a sequel had been kicking around Hollywood for some time, and one of the more recent ideas was to create a movie that would go directly to Warner Bros. streaming service Max. The budget for the movie was at one time roughly $147 million due largely to “star salaries and producer fees,” but director Tim Burton actually squeezed the budget so that the movie would get an exclusive release in theaters.

They ultimately got the budget down to $99 million, just below the $100 million threshold that would ensure the movie played in theaters. As part of that budget reduction, stars Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder, Jenna Ortega and Catherine O’Hara all agreed to taking less money upfront in exchange for a greater percentage of the backend gross. Following the movie’s tremendous success, it seems like that was a smart bet.

The film has now topped the U.S. box office for two weeks in a row, and could be set to play well all the way through Halloween. The movie has been more of a hit than even many prognosticators expected, drafting in large part off of nostalgia from the first film, and in part off of the solid reviews the sequel received. It seems like everyone is grateful the movie wound up in theaters, as it made everyone better off in the end.

Joe Allen
Contributor
Joe Allen is a freelance culture writer based in upstate New York. His work has been published in The Washington Post, The…
Christopher Nolan’s ‘Oppenheimer’: Why This Might Be The Most Epic WWII Film Yet
Christopher Nolan Aims to Capture the Film's Literary Inspiration
The movie poster for 'Oppenheimer' from Universal Pictures.

In the just-released Oppenheimer poster, Universal Pictures shows a silhouette of the scientist who led the group that constructed the atomic bomb. The man is engulfed in flames, foregrounded with the tagline, “The World Forever Changes.”

What is Oppenheimer about? Director Christopher Nolan follows scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer’s progress as "The Father of the Atomic Bomb." Oppenheimer led Los Alamos physicists in developing the atomic bomb — the weapon that ended the Pacific theater of WWII, launched the United States into post-war power, and forever changed the global landscape. While not a traditional war movie, this film will focus on an important aspect of WWII history.

Read more
The Magic Number 170 – the Best Nicolas Cage Film Yet?
Nicolas Cage (right) and Pedro Pascal (left) in 'The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent

The short answer? No, "The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent" isn't the best Nic Cage film yet. The film’s worth a watch, though, and not because Cage plays Cage in the action comedy.

The film currently sports an 87% score on Rotten Tomatoes after 275 audience and critic reviews. This is a bit of a fall from the film’s first week when it scored 100%, the highest rating of all 170 movies with a Cage credit on the site. So, while it can’t claim the top Cage film, the meta-upon-meta movie works.

Read more
Check Out the First Three Minutes of ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’ Before Friday’s Release
Tom Holland's Spider-Man tries to convince Doc Ock he doesn't know the villain.

Tom Holland's Spider-Man tries to convince Doc Ock he doesn't know the villain. Marvel/YouTube

“Hi? Do I know you?” a flummoxed Tom Holland asks soon-to-be just-as mixed-up Doc Ock at the beginning of Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Read more