Skip to main content

5 interesting facts about the Super Bowl’s history to gear up for the game

Curious about the Super Bowl and its lengthy history? We've got the basics for you right here

It’s set, this year’s Super Bowl will see the Kansas City Chiefs take on the Philadelphia Eagles. The biggest game in the land goes back almost six decades, putting the best of the divisions (the AFC and NFC) against one another.

If you’re already confused as to what differentiates the National Football Conference from the American Football Conference from the AFL-CIO, then perhaps you need a more fundamental education on the basics of football. If you’re more interested in the history of the Super Bowl itself as opposed to trying to understand the arcane rules and governing bodies that control American professional football, then you’re in the right place.

Recommended Videos

This February, Super Bowl LVII will take place. If you don’t speak Roman numerals, that translates to 57. As you can see, this is a longstanding tradition that crowns the best NFL team with a glorious trophy. There are cool storylines, like the fact that the game will see two young and incredible Black quarterbacks go head to head. And we may be witness the future of the league, as these two teams have won Super Bowls recently (Philly in 2017, KC in 2020) and show no signs of slowing down.

While we’re on the topic, let’s take a little Super Bowl history course, shall we?

Super Bowl I

Super Bowl I Kansas City Chiefs vs Green Bay Packers 1967
Super Bowl I: Kansas City Chiefs vs Green Bay Packers in 1967. James Flores/Getty Images

The first Super Bowl was played on January 15, 1967, at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. But no one even knew the first-ever Super Bowl had been played until well after that fateful day on which the Green Bay Packers crushed the Kansas City Chiefs, because the name “Super Bowl” was not applied until later. (That’s what we call a neologism, folks.) Whereas these days, broadcast rights to the Super Bowl are fiercely guarded, that game was shown on two networks — CBS and NBC — at the same time. (There were only three major broadcasters at the time anyway. Poor ABC.) An estimated 51 million people watched Super Bowl I, which is impressive, as that means more than a quarter of all Americans tuned in for the first-of-its-kind event.

The biggest Super Bowl blowout

Super Bowl XXIV San Francisco 49ers vs Denver Broncos 1990 Joe Montana
Super Bowl XXIV: San Francisco 49ers vs Denver Broncos in 1990. Icon Sportswire/Getty Images

It’s not easy to be a fan of some NFL teams. The Washington Redskins are notorious for their ability to give up leads in the fourth quarter; the Detroit Lions have never been to a Super Bowl; and, in 1990, the Denver Broncos became the most resoundingly defeated Super Bowl loser of all time. That year saw the Broncos face the San Francisco 49ers in Super Bowl XXIV. Led by celebrated quarterback Joe Montana, and coming off a Super Bowl victory in the 1988 championship, the 49ers were heavily favored to win. But the wildly lopsided result was a surprise even to the analysts of the day. The 49ers beat the Broncos 55 to 10, meaning a spread of 45 points. That still stings more than three decades later.

The closest Super Bowl scores

Super Bowl XXV New York Giants vs Buffalo Bills 1991 Scott Norwood
Super Bowl XXV: New York Giants vs Buffalo Bills in 1991. Icon Sportswire /Getty Images / Getty Images

On the other side of the spectrum, though just one year later, we have Super Bowl XXV from 1991. In that storied contest, the New York Giants beat the Buffalo Bills by just one point. And amazingly, the game ended with the Bills losing after their kicker missed a field goal attempt by about two feet. The loss in Super Bowl XXV began an infamous precedent for the Buffalo Bills, who would go on to lose four Super Bowl games in a row. And no, the Bills have never won the Big Game.

Super Bowl LVII

It may seem a little odd, but we’re finally witnessing a Super Bowl that doesn’t involve Tom Brady. It’s a little refreshing, to be honest, and likely a glimpse into the future of the league. The Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes and Jalen Hurts of the Eagles are arguably the two best quarterbacks in the NFL, each in their 20s. The former has been dealing with a foot injury, but with an extra week of rest before the big game, he’ll likely be in good shape. Meanwhile, Hurts is having one of the best statistical seasons in Eagles history at his position. The game will likely be very close and, at the moment, Philadelphia is slightly favored.

The growth of commercial costs

It’s common knowledge that many people watch the Super Bowl for the commercials, not to see the Patriots win yet again. During Super Bowl I, television commercials cost $37,000 per half-minute of airtime. And that was a lot then, sure. But keep this in mind: adjusted for inflation, $37,000 in 1967 is about equivalent to $265,000 today. In 1974, ads first hit the $100,000-plus per 30-second cost. This was during Super Bowl VIII, for the record. Between 1984 and 1985, the price of a Super Bowl commercial vaulted from around $370,000 per half-minute all the way to $525,000 for the same amount of airtime. By 1994, a 30-second Super Bowl ad cost more than $1 million. In 2021, companies shelled out over $5.5 million for that same broadcast real estate.

By now, you should be jazzed for the Super Bowl. Even if you don’t love the game, there are great halftime performances, pre-game rumors, and game-day snacks to enjoy. Perhaps it’s just an excuse to fire up the grill for some great barbecue recipes. Either way, it all goes down on February 12th.

Topics
Steven John
Steven John is a writer and journalist living just outside New York City, by way of 12 years in Los Angeles, by way of…
The best sci-fi shows streaming right now
From Lost to The Twilight Zone, these are the best sci-fi shows ever made
The cast of Lost.

Sci-fi television has been around since the earliest days of the medium, and it's evolved along with the rest of television. In every era, though, there have been great sci-fi shows that remind us of how well the genre can fit on television.

Great science fiction can reflect on the world we know, even as it expands our understanding of what's possible. Regardless of exactly what these shows are about, though, each of them tells their story in gripping fashion, taking full advantage of what TV is capable of.

Read more
‘The Brutalist’ director Brady Corbet says he’s made no money promoting the film
The director said that he makes more directing commercials than he does making movies.
Adrien Brody in The Brutalist

It can be wonderful to get nominated for a bunch of awards, but The Brutalist director Brady Corbet said that it's not exactly a profitable one. In an interview on WTF with Marc Maron, Corbet said that he hadn't actually made any money promoting the movie.

“This is the first time I’ve made any money in years,” Corbet said, saying that his first real paycheck in a long time came from directing three advertisements in Portugal. “Both my partner and I made zero dollars on the last two films we made. Yes, actually zero. So we had to just live off of a paycheck from three years ago and obviously, the timing during an awards campaign and travel every two or three days was less than ideal, but it was an opportunity that landed in my lap, and I jumped at it.”

Read more
John Malkovich said that he rejected Marvel movies prior to ‘Fantastic Four’ over low pay
He explained that Marvel movies took a lot of time, and he wanted to be paid accordingly.
John Malkovich in Fantastic Four

Over the course of its 15 years of existence, Marvel has lured a number of surprising actors into its orbit. We live in a world where Angelina Jolie and Harry Styles have both appeared in Marvel projects (actually the same one).

John Malkovich was one of the last Marvel holdouts, but that's changing with The Fantastic Four: First Steps. In an interview with GQ, Malkovich explained that he had been approached to do Marvel projects in the past, but had always turned them down.
“The reason I didn’t do them had nothing to do with any artistic considerations whatsoever,” Malkovich explained. “I didn’t like the deals they made, at all.”
He explained that he simply wanted more money to work through the conditions required to make a movie on this scale.
“These films are quite grueling to make…. If you’re going to hang from a crane in front of a green screen for six months, pay me. You don’t want to pay me, it’s cool, but then I don’t want to do it, because I’d rather be onstage, or be directing a play, or doing something else," he continued.
Malkovich is, perhaps unsurprisingly, playing villain Ivan Kragoff, also known as Red Ghost in the film. He explained that working on the movie was actually like stage work in some respects. "It’s not that dissimilar to doing theater,” he said, “You imagine a bunch of stuff that isn’t there and do your little play.”

Read more