Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Culture
  3. Evergreens

‘Dazed and Confused’ at 30: Is the ultimate chill movie still … chill?

30 years later: Is 'Dazed and Confused' worth another watch?

Dazed and Confused.
Gramercy Pictures

Some movies leave a mark so indelible that their greatness is taken for granted. Jaws. 2001: A Space Odyssey. Pink Flamingos. These giants tread enormous footprints upon the landscape of film and inspired whole genres of copycats. I would like to proffer another title that is rarely thought to rank among those of such import: Richard Linklater’s generation-transcending stoner dramedy Dazed and Confused.

At first blush, the movie Dazed and Confused might not seem worthy of such esteem, but that is only because — to the undiscerning eye — its caliber has been muddied by a mess of lesser high school graduation flicks. From the vantage of its 30th anniversary, however, it’s apparent that this serious mediation on the fleeting nature of youth in the clothing of a teen stoner flick is something of a masterpiece.

Dazed and Confused.
Gramercy Pictures

I get older, they stay the same age…

Dazed and Confused is a movie that defines timelessness and universality, ironically while portraying a very specific time, place, and perspective. Set in the Austin of 1976 and occurring entirely within a single day — high school graduation — and completely devoid of any perspective outside that of a bunch of high school teens (with the notable exception of Wooderson, of course), the context may be hyper-specific, but the impact is ecumenical.

Recommended Videos

Ostensibly, the story of graduating baby boomers, the movie was released in 1993, directly into peak Gen-X years, found financial success nearly a decade later among early millennials, and today it’s comfortably considered a classic. It’s a story and movie that have aged well, and in the process have repeatedly found relevance with new generations of viewers.

Dazed and Confused.
Gramercy Pictures

Deceptively smart

Like the emerging adults it portrays, there’s a brilliance to Dazed and Confused that can go unappreciated through the haze of weed and bro jokes. It’s a deeply intelligent film, both thematically and technically.

Behind the camera, it’s in many ways a graduation story for Linklater himself. This was his first big studio movie after his little indie film Slacker, which he’d shot for just over $20,000. After Dazed, Linklater would go on to create great works like Boyhood, and of course, the Sunset trilogy, as well as a smattering of commercially successful movies of varying quality. Technically speaking, Dazed presents a clear example of Linklater’s talent as a director. Many of the shots are outright beautiful, the 1970s vibes are spot on, and it wields its pure-gold soundtrack as well as contemporaries like Pulp Fiction and Goodfellas.

This is, when all is said and done, a gorgeous movie to watch, both for the eyes and ears.

And the story that movie contains delivers a genuine, emotional impact. Dazed is funny — and not dick-in-pie funny like so many of the imitators that would follow. Its humor is frequently as thought-provoking as it is laugh-provoking, but more than that, this is a movie that makes you feel something real — that sensation that time is slipping past, that maybe it already has. That maybe nostalgia is all there ever is, and we’re all just a bunch of ex-football jocks reliving old glories from the field and aging Woodersons lusting after youth.

Dazed and Confused.
Gramercy Pictures

Cultural impact

While Dazed and Confused drew much of its influence from 1980s high school titles like the Breakfast Club, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, and Pretty in Pink, Linklater’s 1993 entry into this tradition kicked off a trend that continued through the ’90s, resulting in a burst of copycat coming-of-age tales of uneven quality. It’s a direct path from Dazed and Confused to Clueless and Empire Records, then on to late-90s backwash like American Pie and Road Trip. The niche circled around and became good again with installments like Superbad and the more recent Booksmart.

We can credit Dazed with introducing the world to Matthew McConaughey, and of course, Matthew McConaughey’s most renowned catchphrase: “Alright, alright, alright.” Here you’ll find Ben Affleck in his first prominent role, and another Dazed and Confused character actor, Adam Goldberg, front and center in his first role altogether. Not to mention Parker Posey, Renee Zellweger, and Joey Lauren Adams.

And let’s not forget that soundtrack. There are no musical performances in the whole thing (except for Milla Jovovich’s acoustic ditty about aliens), but still, it’s considered one of the greatest rock-and-roll films of all time.

Director, Richard Linklater
Wikimedia

The director

In the end, Dazed and Confused achieved masterpiece status because it so perfectly captured and portrayed a particularly vulnerable experience that was common to all — the feeling of the past slipping away and uncertainty about the future to come. Linklater has repeatedly proven his ability to accurately and engagingly deliver such intimate portraits. Of the experience of love through the Sunrise trilogy. Of family in Boyhood. Of addiction in A Scanner Darkly. Even of one’s love of music in A School of Rock.

With Dazed and Confused, Linklater first did what he went on to repeatedly do so well: touch on the deep emotional experiences that arise through basic, foundational human events. Graduating from school. Growing into adulthood. Navigating the complexities of friendship.

Here we are. 30 years later, and its message still rings true: You just gotta keep on livin’ man. L-I-V-I-N.

Nick Hilden is a lifestyle and culture writer whose work has appeared in the Washington Post, Esquire, Rolling Stone, Afar… Read Full Bio
What I Learned From John Daly About Smoking Cigars
Body Part, Finger, Hand

I’ve been smoking cigars for two decades. I fell in love with the aroma when I walked into my first cigar lounge, Fair Oaks Cigars, in South Pasadena, California, when I was 21 years old. I remember my first stogie — Flor de las Antillas from My Father Cigars. During my early 20s and 30s, I smoked cigars religiously, at least five per week. I puffed alone in the living room, hours before getting ready to hit the town with friends. On my patio on a lazy Saturday afternoon. In the car during heavy traffic. On the rooftop lounge at the mid-high-rise building I lived in for a few years in downtown Los Angeles. Inside my loft — decked with concrete floors and walls, and exposed pipes — while watching pay-per-view boxing or a Dodgers game.

No matter the setting, smoking a cigar, to me, was the occasion. I never needed, nor do I need now, a reason to light up. It doesn’t matter if I smoke alone at a lounge or with friends on my patio; I love that, for an hour-plus, time slows down for me. Because smoking cigars can’t and shouldn’t be rushed. It’s not a cigarette. From the moment you light up to when you set down the final stub of a cigar, at least 45 minutes to an hour has passed, during which, if you’re like me, you made new friends, formed stronger bonds, and/or reflected on all that is great in your life.

Read more
What’s the deal with Bryson DeChambeau? The Open Championship controversy explained
Baseball Cap, Cap, Clothing

It was Ryan Fox who birdied the 18th hole on Sunday to win The 154th Open Championship at Royal Birkdale. Despite the electric finish, all anyone’s talking about is Bryson DeChambeau, who was given a two-stroke penalty following Friday’s second round. The penalty has apparently divided the golf community, but the fact remains that DeChambeau’s response to the penalty over the weekend took away from Fox’s triumphant moment. And now, word is that DeChambeau reportedly tried and failed to rope President Donald Trump into said controversy.

The drama unfolded after Friday’s second round, when it seemed DeChambeau finished the day in sole possession of second place with a -7 under score heading into the third round. At least it appeared that way — until the leaderboard was updated to reflect a two-stroke penalty against DeChambeau, after officials claimed he stomped on the grass behind his ball to improve the line of his swing at No. 5. That, officials say, violates Rule 8.1, which states that, in order “to support the principle of ‘play the course as you find it,’ this Rule restricts what a player may do to improve any of these protected ‘conditions affecting the stroke’ (anywhere on or off the course).”

Read more
Spain outlasts Argentina to win FIFA World Cup and cap sensational tournament
Celebrating, Person, Clothing

And just like that, Argentina’s luck ran out. Spain’s Ferran Torres emphatically found the back of the net from 8 yards out in extra time to secure La Roja a 1-0 win and the country’s second World Cup. Torres’ goal came in the 106th minute, but don’t let that fool you: this was a one-sided contest from start to finish, and a deeper look at the box score reflects that.

I predicted Spain would beat Argentina, 3-1, and from the start it seemed like that prediction would come to fruition. Spain came out swinging, almost immediately recording two shots on goal, including an early header that came so close to finding the back of the net. Spain’s relentless attack was evident throughout the match. La Roja applied pressure with swift passing and precision shots. Just ask Argentina goalkeeper Emiliano “Dibu” Martínez, who seemed to be the only one playing defense, making one spectacular save after another, 11 to be exact.

Read more