Skip to main content

Hi-fi Corner: Shure’s KSE1500 electrostats will blow your mind

shure kse1500 electrostatic in ear headphones hands on manual
Image used with permission by copyright holder
When reviewing complex technology, it’s always tempting to fall back on the numbers — empirical data helps to make your point. And though data alone rarely tells the story in the highly subjective world of high-class headphones, there’s one number associated Shure’s new in-ear magnum opus, the KSE1500, that cannot be ignored: 3,000. As in dollars. That’s what it costs to put these innocuous-looking hunks of translucent plastic in your ears. Well, technically it’s $2,000 for the earphones, and $1,000 for the amplifier, but considering they’re co-dependent, that’s a moot point. Any way you cut it, $3,000 is an absolutely breath-stealing number.

However, focusing solely on the cost — while perfectly understandable for 99.999 percent of us — really does miss the point here. After eight years spent on research and development, jumping over multiple technical hurdles and training an unrelenting eye on sonic perfection, Shure has created something extraordinary in the KSE1500. That’s because the company decided to forego traditional in-ear driver designs for the complex (and downright vexing) technological challenge of micro-sizing electrostatic transduction.

Recommended Videos

Shure isn’t the first to the punch here, but squeezing electrostatic technology into a fully self-contained package of this shape and size is tantamount to cramming a rocket thruster under the hood of a ‘97 Honda Accord. And while the KSE1500 are priced for only the most ardent audiophiles, any headphone lover can appreciate their sonic achievements. The 1500 unearth a sound marked by unparalleled clarity and transient response above, while coaxing rich and ruddy layers of velvety warmth down below, placing these ‘phones among the most elite performers we’ve ever heard.

Related: Let Shure’s SHA900 portable headphone amp take you to church

The goods

Electrostatic drivers are a bit more elegant in design than the drivers in your average headphones, composed of a razor-thin membrane suspended between two electrified plates that use static electricity (hence the name) to create sound waves. The tiny variations in voltage which power the dynamic drivers and balanced armatures you’ll find inside most headphones in the genre isn’t enough to drive them, so the signal must be highly amplified in order to move the membrane by voltage alone — hence the KSE1500’s dedicated amplifier, which applies up to 200 volts of power.

Electrostats also differ from another driver variety used heavily in hi-fi headphones, planar magnetic drivers, which are also composed of a thin membrane, but use a circuit excited by a magnetic field to create sound. Confused yet? The real takeaway here is that, in the case of both planar magnetic and electrostatic drivers, the technology is extremely complex, and is usually crafted on a much larger scale — like monster-sized, in comparison. Electrostats are what Sennheiser’s mighty new Orpheus over-ear headphones use to create sound that’s virtually un-paralleled anywhere on earth. But those are big cans! Shure has managed to micro-size the KSE1500’s electrostatic drivers to Honey-I-Shrunk-the-Kids proportions.

And that’s just one of the features that make the KSE1500 so special.

Shure claims the KSE1500 are the first ever “electrostatic sound isolating” earphones, capable of delivering a whopping 37 dB of ambient noise isolation. Indeed, with just a light twist of music, the headphones virtually erase the outside world, and even without sound, we can barely hear ourselves typing this article.

Then there’s the cable, which trades the traditional flat design of most electrostatic headphones for a round(ish) kevlar-reinforced coil that looks just like a typical headphone cable at the top. At the bottom, however, it ends in a proprietary 6-pin connector for use only with dedicated amps.

The sound

Isolating” is a defining word for the KSE1500, and in more ways than one. Never before have we experienced such starkly delineated instrumentation across virtually every genre, apart, perhaps, from Sennheiser’s aforementioned Orpheus (priced at $50K). Vocals, saxophone, guitar, bass — you name it, each instrument is carved and polished, and the dust blown away to expose nothing less than its elemental recorded sound, and all the nuances that come along.

Conclusion

There’s no denying that Shure’s KSE1500 are a lavish pair of in-ears that only the most enthusiastic — or downright nutty — audiophiles will seek out. While the in-ears themselves are portable, being chained to a dedicated amp means you’ll always have to budget some extra space.

But there is also no denying the KSE1500 represent a monumental breakthrough in headphone technology — one that may well yield very real benefits in the form of an entirely new generation of earphones we can all enjoy, stretching beyond the KSE1500’s own lifecycle.

In the end, while our reasoned mind says we’d never spend $3,000 on an in-ear headphone, our ears convey another message: Run out and buy these — right now.

A version of this post first appeared on our “brother site” Digital Trends.

Ryan Waniata
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Waniata is an audio engineer, musician, composer, and all-around lover of all things tech, audio, and cinema. Hailing…
The best sci-fi shows streaming right now
From Lost to The Twilight Zone, these are the best sci-fi shows ever made
The cast of Lost.

Sci-fi television has been around since the earliest days of the medium, and it's evolved along with the rest of television. In every era, though, there have been great sci-fi shows that remind us of how well the genre can fit on television.

Great science fiction can reflect on the world we know, even as it expands our understanding of what's possible. Regardless of exactly what these shows are about, though, each of them tells their story in gripping fashion, taking full advantage of what TV is capable of.

Read more
‘The Brutalist’ director Brady Corbet says he’s made no money promoting the film
The director said that he makes more directing commercials than he does making movies.
Adrien Brody in The Brutalist

It can be wonderful to get nominated for a bunch of awards, but The Brutalist director Brady Corbet said that it's not exactly a profitable one. In an interview on WTF with Marc Maron, Corbet said that he hadn't actually made any money promoting the movie.

“This is the first time I’ve made any money in years,” Corbet said, saying that his first real paycheck in a long time came from directing three advertisements in Portugal. “Both my partner and I made zero dollars on the last two films we made. Yes, actually zero. So we had to just live off of a paycheck from three years ago and obviously, the timing during an awards campaign and travel every two or three days was less than ideal, but it was an opportunity that landed in my lap, and I jumped at it.”

Read more
John Malkovich said that he rejected Marvel movies prior to ‘Fantastic Four’ over low pay
He explained that Marvel movies took a lot of time, and he wanted to be paid accordingly.
John Malkovich in Fantastic Four

Over the course of its 15 years of existence, Marvel has lured a number of surprising actors into its orbit. We live in a world where Angelina Jolie and Harry Styles have both appeared in Marvel projects (actually the same one).

John Malkovich was one of the last Marvel holdouts, but that's changing with The Fantastic Four: First Steps. In an interview with GQ, Malkovich explained that he had been approached to do Marvel projects in the past, but had always turned them down.
“The reason I didn’t do them had nothing to do with any artistic considerations whatsoever,” Malkovich explained. “I didn’t like the deals they made, at all.”
He explained that he simply wanted more money to work through the conditions required to make a movie on this scale.
“These films are quite grueling to make…. If you’re going to hang from a crane in front of a green screen for six months, pay me. You don’t want to pay me, it’s cool, but then I don’t want to do it, because I’d rather be onstage, or be directing a play, or doing something else," he continued.
Malkovich is, perhaps unsurprisingly, playing villain Ivan Kragoff, also known as Red Ghost in the film. He explained that working on the movie was actually like stage work in some respects. "It’s not that dissimilar to doing theater,” he said, “You imagine a bunch of stuff that isn’t there and do your little play.”

Read more