Skip to main content

Tim Burton lowered the budget on ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ to ensure the film got a theatrical release

The movie has now made an incredible amount at the box office.

Michael Keaton in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.
Warner Bros.

Although most critics agree it doesn’t live up to the original classic, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has been an undeniable box office sensation since it was released in early September. The movie outgrossed the first installment in its opening weekend, and has now made more than $250 million worldwide.

According to reporting in The New York Times, ideas for a sequel had been kicking around Hollywood for some time, and one of the more recent ideas was to create a movie that would go directly to Warner Bros. streaming service Max. The budget for the movie was at one time roughly $147 million due largely to “star salaries and producer fees,” but director Tim Burton actually squeezed the budget so that the movie would get an exclusive release in theaters.

Recommended Videos

They ultimately got the budget down to $99 million, just below the $100 million threshold that would ensure the movie played in theaters. As part of that budget reduction, stars Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder, Jenna Ortega and Catherine O’Hara all agreed to taking less money upfront in exchange for a greater percentage of the backend gross. Following the movie’s tremendous success, it seems like that was a smart bet.

The film has now topped the U.S. box office for two weeks in a row, and could be set to play well all the way through Halloween. The movie has been more of a hit than even many prognosticators expected, drafting in large part off of nostalgia from the first film, and in part off of the solid reviews the sequel received. It seems like everyone is grateful the movie wound up in theaters, as it made everyone better off in the end.

Joe Allen
Contributor
Joe Allen is a freelance culture writer based in upstate New York. His work has been published in The Washington Post, The…
Will there be a Beetlejuice 3?
Beetlejuice 3 has not been greenlit, and it may never be.
Michael Keaton in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.

It took several decades for the team behind Beetlejuice to finally come up with a sequel. Now that they have, though, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has turned into a box office phenomenon, and introduced an entire new generation to its titular character. Following the success of Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, many are naturally wondering whether the movie will get some sort of sequel.

The money may lead you to believe that a sequel is coming, but director Tim Burton seems fairly uninterested.

Read more
Ridley Scott’s ‘Napoleon’ just got a new director’s cut on Apple TV+
The director's cut is now available to stream on Apple TV+.
Joaquin Phoenix in Napoleon.

Almost a year after Napoleon hit theaters to a mixed critical response, director Ridley Scott has returned to announce that his 2023 film about the famous French dictator is now available in an entirely new version. Napoleon: The Director's Cut features 48 minutes of never-before-seen footage, and that version of the film is now available on Apple TV+.

Based on the teaser that was released alongside the announcement, it seems like much of the extended runtime will be devoted to the battle sequences that were often cut short in the theatrical version. Those battle sequences were part of the movie's calling card, and they're something that Scott has become well-known for executing over the course of his long career.

Read more
Tim Burton wouldn’t want to make a superhero movie today
Burton directed Batman all the way back in 1989.
Batman lifting The Joker by the collar.

There are a number of different places you can trace our current moment of utter superhero cultural dominance back to. It could be 2002's Spider-Man, or 2000's X-Men, or 2008's Iron Man. If you go even further back, though, you could argue that the trend really started with 1989's Batman, which was directed by Tim Burton and starred Michael Keaton.

Burton directed that movie to tremendous success, and he also directed its first sequel, Batman Returns. Since leaving that franchise behind, though, Burton has not gone back to the superhero well, and thanks to a new interview with Variety, we now know why.

Read more