Skip to main content

How many calories does hiking burn per hour?

You might be surprised what you burn

A man walking towards a rocky point overlooking a lake
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Hiking is an often-overlooked form of exercise in our modern, tech-obsessed society. Most guys are far more likely to go for a run in their neighborhood, hit the gym for cardio and weights workouts, or head to the tennis or basketball court with a buddy. However, hiking offers a welcomed departure from the hustle, bustle, and connectedness to electronics that largely typify our everyday life these days, immersing you in the serene natural soundtrack of Mother Nature and giving your eyes and ears a break from screens, programming, and manufactured stimulation. It’s also a viable form of cardiovascular and muscular exercise, enabling you to burn calories and stoke your metabolism like other forms of exercise.

Recommended Videos

Having a decent estimate of the number of calories you burn while hiking is helpful if you’re trying to lose weight, maintain your weight, or even put on mass, as your energy expenditure during physical activity factors into half of the ever-important “calories in versus calories out” truism of body weight manipulation. It also helps inform your fueling needs so that you can hit the trails with ample hiking snacks to power you up and down all the peaks you hope to summit without bonking from low blood sugar while you’re stuck thick in the woods.

Unfortunately, ballparking the number of calories you burn while hiking isn’t as simple as looking at the calories readout on an elliptical machine at the end of your workout; rather, many factors affect your energy expenditure from hiking. However, as described below, it is possible to gauge calories burned hiking, so keep reading to see how hiking stacks up in your fitness and weight plan and what factors affect the number of calories you burn hiking.

A smiling man carrying a backpack.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Factors that affect the number of calories burned hiking

Because it’s not a cut-and-dry equation, we need to look at the various factors that affect the number of calories you burn on a hike. Here are the things that will define the calories you burn hiking.

Two male hikers making a high five in a forest.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Body weight

As with all forms of exercise, the number of calories burned while hiking is largely dependent on your body weight. Simply put, the more you weigh, the greater your caloric burn for any given hike. For example, a man who weighs 160 pounds will burn somewhere in the neighborhood of 425 and 450 calories per hour hiking, while a 200-pound man will burn closer to 550 calories per hour on the same hike.

A man hiking in a forest
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Body composition

Less significant than total body weight as a factor in caloric expenditure but still significant is your body composition, or the relative percentage of lean body mass and body fat. Muscle tissue is far more metabolically active than adipose tissue (fat) — especially during exercise — which means that if you have a more sculpted build, you’ll burn more calories per hour hiking than someone with the same body weight but a higher body fat percentage.

A male hiker checking the time on his watch
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Speed

The faster you hike, the greater the intensity of the workout. Your pace dictates the distance you hike in an hour, which ultimately determines how many calories you will burn. Moreover, much like the principle applied with HIIT workouts, if you hike at a vigorous enough intensity, you’ll stoke your metabolism so significantly that you’ll continue to have an elevated metabolic rate or burn additional calories, even after your hiking boots have come off. Using trekking poles can also increase the speed, intensity, and muscular demand of the hike, and thus, the number of calories burned.

A male hiker standing on the summit
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Terrain

One of the unique factors affecting the number of calories burned hiking — absent in controlled forms of exercise such as cardio machines like rowers, ellipticals, and spin bikes — is the terrain you traverse on the bike. Terrain refers to the topography in terms of uphills and downhills, as well as the footing on the ground.

Hikes over challenging and varied terrains, such as those with long or steep inclines or lots of rocky sections, burn more calories than flat hikes with even, smooth walking trails because the muscular work to power up hills or to stabilize when dealing with unpredictable footing burns additional calories. If you’re looking to torch some serious calories, take on that mountain peak you’ve been eyeing instead of the flat garden path that meanders around a small brook.

A hiker carrying his hiking pack and gear.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Pack weight

It probably comes as no surprise that carrying a day pack or backpacking with a heavy pack burns more calories. A heavier pack may increase your energy expenditure by 50 to 100 calories per hour hiking, while a substantial pack may boost the number of calories you burn hiking by upward of 300 per hour.

A man carrying an orange backpack enjoying the view from a mountain top.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Fitness level

If you’ve ever hit a weight loss plateau despite following your diet plan to a T and keeping up with your usual fitness routine, it’s likely your body has adapted to the workout and become more efficient. Unfortunately, as much as it’s a relief when what was once a brutal workout starts to feel totally manageable over time, this reduction in necessary effort is evidence of the progress your body has made and the fitness adaptations that have occurred from the same exercise stimulus. In other words, if you haven’t been working out and then decide to run five miles one day, your body is going to struggle to get you through the workout.

However, if you continue to run the same five-mile route at the same pace for the next six weeks, it will become easier and easier. Your muscles become more efficient at extracting oxygen from the blood, neuromuscular connections operate in a more coordinated manner, and your heart, lungs, and muscles become stronger. These adaptations improve your running economy and the number of calories you burn during the same run decreases. The same principle holds true for hiking. The fitter you are, and the more inured you are to the challenges of hiking, the fewer calories you’ll burn on your hike. With that said, this difference isn’t all that drastic, and it certainly shouldn’t deter you from being a regular on the trails.

A man going on an early-morning hike in the mountain.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

How many calories does hiking burn?

So, with all that said, determining the number of calories you burn on a hike doesn’t necessarily have an easy answer. Your best approximation will come from wearing a heart rate activity monitor. This will gauge your exercise intensity and the associated metabolic cost. If you don’t have a fitness tracker or an app on your phone, the metabolic equivalent (MET) formula can be used to provide a generalized estimate of how many calories you’ll burn hiking:

Calories burned = MET (6) * weight (kg) * time (hrs)

The MET value relates to the amount of oxygen used in the particular activity. It is generally between 6 and 7 for hiking. The more intense the hike (steep, fast), the higher the number you should use.

For example, if you’re a 180-pound (82 kg) guy hiking for 1 hour, you can expect to burn around 492 calories (6*82*1=492) for a moderate hike and around 574 calories (7*82*1=574) if you’re working a little harder. Of course, if you’re carrying a pack, you should add the weight of the pack to your body weight.

Man running by mountains on a road
Pixabay / Pexels

Do you burn more calories running than hiking?

In general, you will burn more calories running than hiking for the same amount of time. One reason is that running is a higher-intensity exercise compared to hiking. Your heart rate elevates more, and your body works harder to sustain the activity, leading to a greater calorie burn per minute. Also, running uses more muscle groups than hiking. The constant pounding of your feet on the ground and the need to propel yourself forward engages more muscles, requiring more energy.

Here’s an illustration of the difference:

  • On average, a person burns around 400 calories per hour hiking at a moderate pace (3 to 4 mph).
  • Running at a moderate pace (6 to 8 mph) for the same person and hour could burn closer to 600 to 800 calories.

However, there are some nuances to consider. For example, hikers often hike for longer durations than runners can comfortably run. So, if someone hikes for 2 hours and burns 800 calories, it might be comparable to a shorter, more intense run.

Though burning calories is certainly one of the perks of a challenging hike, even if you’re just out there to get some fresh air and move your body at a leisurely pace, you’ll reap plenty of rewards from any hike, whether it leaves you breathless from exertion or breathless simply from the beauty of the nature surrounding you.

Topics
Amber Sayer
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Amber Sayer is a fitness, nutrition, and wellness writer and editor, and was previously a Fitness Editor at Byrdie. She…
How to lose belly fat fast: Your daily checklist
There's no quick magic fix, but there is a way
Scale with measuring tape on top

If you are interested in learning how to lose belly fat fast, you're not alone. As a trainer and nutritionist, stubborn belly fat is one of the most common concerns shared with me by clients. Also, depending on factors like genetics, you may tend to store fat in your abdomen more than in other areas, making it especially frustrating.

Luckily, you can shed those extra pounds and feel like your most fit and healthy self by simply being consistent with a few healthy habits. Keep reading to learn more!
How to lose weight fast

Read more
Here’s how many marathons a chihuahua finished…yes, you read that right
If you need a funny and positive story to perk up your day or motivate you to go for a run, this is it.
chihuahua ran marathon crossed finish line 2

You can imagine animals like zebras and antelope running long distances across vast areas of land, but a chihuahua running a marathon is a whole different story. If you need a funny and positive story to perk up your day, this is it. While other pampered pooches snuggle into their beds in the comfort of home, one fierce and athletic little chihuahua just keeps crossing that finish line. So, how many marathons did the dedicated Jellybean finish? 
Crossing the finish line

9-lb Jellybean is an energetic six-year-old chihuahua mix who has successfully completed six marathons, and now, she’s trying to break her running record in 2025. A full marathon is 26.2 miles, which is an impressive distance for a chihuahua. As Jellybean’s owner reminds us, potential isn’t defined by appearances; it’s about heart, determination, and putting the work in. 

Read more
How many minutes of weekly aerobic exercise is needed for weight loss? New study
How much cardio do we need to power through every week to really drop those pounds?
People doing jumping jacks in an exercise class

Previous research shows that weekly aerobic exercise can help you lose weight. Does more weekly aerobic exercise result in more weight loss? How much cardio do we need to power through to really drop those pounds? I always figured that sweating more frequently for longer durations amplified weight loss. Recently, researchers reviewed 116 clinical trials to reveal how much aerobic exercise resulted in more significant reductions in body weight, body fat, and waist size. Let’s delve into the new research.
The study

In a recent review published in Jama Network Open, researchers wanted to explore how physical exercise affected weight loss, waist size, and body fat. The clinical trials included in the review reported data for 6,880 overweight or obese adults with a body mass index or BMI over 25. The review studies involved clinical trials with durations of at least eight weeks.
The results

Read more